Both Canon and our Red Digital neighbors are holding press events tonight promising big announcements. What will they be? Both companies have been tight lipped and their is lots of industry speculation.
Will Red introduce Pro Res as a recording option? Will they deliver Scarlet? Will Jim buy Canon? Canon buy Red? Will Canon introduce the long awaited dedicated video camera based on the Canon 5D mark II large sensor? What is your guess? The clock is ticking.
Here is an article published in the Orange County Business Journal discussing a little Red innovations and the pending annoucements.
We received our Red Epic cameras and immediately put them into use. Shooting green screen and location interviews within the first week. We even had a chance to experiment with HDR. All in all a fun time so far.
Our first hands on with Red Epic at NAB 2011 (note the huge grin on our CEO's face). Ted Schilowitz looks on.
Red was cool enough to give us Serial Numbers 15 and 16 as a homage to our original Red One cameras. Pictures and a real report from the field coming soon. We are still waiting for our hand grip and Canon mounts which will be helpful in EFP (electronic field production) and ENG (electronic news gathering).
While not everyone agrees on the details, most will agree that the RED ONE revolutionized digital cinema, either directly or indirectly. Nearly two and half years after it’s introduction RED turned the industry on it’s head again by offering a cost effective major upgrade to their cameras. This upgrade to the Mysterium X sensor has the potential to radically improve the camera already in the hands of it’s owners — some owners, like us, had their RED cameras since 2007. This is a big deal, something never done by Sony, Panasonic, Ikegami, Arri in the history of the industry. Sure you could repair a camera or replace a part – put I have never been able to essentially upgrade a camera I already own without buying an entire new model!
Well? Did RED do it? Does the Mysterium X outshine the Mysterium, and is it worth the investment?
We decided to put it to the test and results are posted below. Here are some stills that represent the tests:
Low Light Compare - Tungsten
Mysterium on left, MX on right, both cameras at ISO 2000. You can immediately see the noise floor and additional image information.
This vehicle headlights and dusk shot is dramatic. Notice the low noise in the MX image, the better sensitivity and contrast range (ability to handle brights and darks). ISO 2000.
We exposed this scene at proper exposure and then opened up 3 stops to make the recording. Using REDcine FLUT controls in POST we wanted to see if scene could be recovered. As you can easily see, the MX was easily recovered (look at the blown out leaves in the sky if the before and after) and would have been completely useable with some additional color correction, but the Mysterium was missing so much information that it would have been impossible to correct. Both cameras were at ISO 800.
The video clips speak for themselves. Enjoy. Both clips are the same, We are testing out the both YouTube and Exposure Room – let me know which player works best for you.
On Exposure Room (download link available – file is 250mb)
On YouTube. Make sure you choose the 720P version and zoom to full screen for best view.
We believe the MX is worth the investment and have upgraded both of our cameras to the new MX sensor. Looking towards the future, our upgraded RED ONES will be a nice compliment to the Scarlet and the EPIC cameras.
Details for the Camera Test and the processing:
We upgraded our camera #15 to Mysterium X and held back our second camera, #16 to Mysterium. The test was conducted with gathering of some industry friends at our OC facilities on Feb. 26, 2010. The tests were informal, yet provide valuable insight into the major differences between the Mysterium and Mysterium X sensor upgrade. The firmware is a beta release, as is the RED Cine program used to convert the R3D files to PRORES and to export snapshot TIFF images.
The process for the test was simple – the same set-up was used for each cameras series of shots. We used the same lighting, tripod, subjects and lenses. Between each test, as few minutes of time lapse and the subject movements and poses were similar, though not exact.
Our goal was to demonstrate any differences between the two sensors. We were expecting a difference in the noise floor and the contrast range. Both were evident and significant to us, see if you agree by reviewing the representative samples we provided. A log of the complete test is available here.
Both cameras set to factory defaults and black shaded before test. Shooting 4K 2:1, RED Code 42 Camera B is Serial No. 16 “Connor”, Mysterium Build 21.4.1 Camera A is Serial No. 15 “RIpley”, Mysterium X upgrade, Build 30.2.4 White balance was matched in Red Cine and all clips were set to REDcolor and REDgamma. No other corrections were made.
The R3D files were exported from REDcine as Apple Pro Res HQ, then brought into FCP. The video files were edited in Final Cut Pro using Apple Pro Res HQ and then exported as a reference file. The reference file was exported to H264 1080P using Telestream Episode. The H264 file was uploaded to web video server where they did their own conversions.
For the split screen comparisons, I exported TIFF still frames from REDcine and, using Photoshop created the split screen and text overlays. The files were exported from Photoshop as TIFF files and then converted to 80% quality JPEG files. As a reminder to all, TIFF single frame exports from the Red 4K 2:1 RAW file are 48MB each frame. The JPEG exports seen her are only 2.5MB so some details are missing as a result. If you are interested in seeing the TIFF files I can make links available on request, however, I feel the additional artifacts don’t distract from the comparative results, but always always happy to hear your thoughts on this.
Thanks to all of our colleagues that participated in the test at our Orange County facilities and share our enthusiasm for RED technology.
PS: We are happy to say that our both of our cameras are now equipped with the MX sensors and are available for rent.
Well our RED #15 is back in house with the upgraded X sensor and we are scheduling our shoot out this Friday, Feb 26. A small group of DP’s are getting together with us to put the Mysterium X through it’s paces and comparing it to our good ol’ Mysterium. We have a nice shot list planned, but are happy to consider some additional requests to really challenge the X sensor.
My friend Micheal Cioni at Lightiron Digital shot some comparative tests that technically show the differences between the sensors in various light conditions. We hope our tests show the real world equivalent.
MYSTERIUM RED SPACE
MYSTERIUM X RED COLOR
Note our tests are just to understand the differences between the sensors, as it is us obvious by now that the upgrade is a no brainer decision for most RED ONE owners.
Depending on our job schedule, immediately after the test we will be sending in our second camera, #16 for the upgrade and will be the only house in the area with two RED cameras upgraded to Mysterium X. Hoorah.
Being part of the first group that were lucky enough to get their RED Cameras on day one (as in August 2007) made us all feel like pioneers or explorers. Shooting some of the first public images with the RED ONE camera was exhilarating. Remember that there was no audio, it only shot 4K and only at 23.97, and there were no working EVF’s.
The day after delivery, we wasted no time and I was lucky enough to be invited to be part of some initial testing that was organized at Chapman College by Brook Willard, and Evin Grant. Jared Land even made an appearance, dropping off a lens for us to play with. Now that I think of it, I guess Scott Webster (#23) and I (#15 & #16) were invited because we had the cameras!
Behind the scenes of RED shooting, September 1st at Chapman Studios in Orange, California.